Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roy Moore Takes Polygraph and Files Complaint for Election Fraud:
True-Pundit ^ | 12-28-17

Posted on 12/27/2017 11:58:19 PM PST by Revel

Roy Moore Takes Polygraph and Files Complaint for Election Fraud: DEMS Cheated; We Finally Have the Proof

Here is the release from Moore

MONTGOMERY, Ala. – An election complaint was filed today on behalf of Roy S. Moore and Judge Roy Moore for U.S. Senate in the Circuit Court of Montgomery Alabama. The purpose of the complaint is to preserve evidence of potential election fraud and to postpone the certification of Alabama’s Special Election by Secretary of State John Merrill until a thorough investigation of potential election fraud, that improperly altered the outcome of this election, is conducted.

Three national Election Integrity experts reached the same independent conclusion: “with a reasonable degree of statistical and mathematical certainty…election fraud occurred.”

The election experts, who submitted affidavits in the complaint, agree that the irregularities in 20 precincts of Jefferson County alone are enough to reverse the outcome of the election. Richard Charnin, who holds three degrees in applied mathematics, and who has written four books on election fraud, calculates the probability of the election results in these precincts happening naturally is “less than one in 15 billion.”

(Excerpt) Read more at truepundit.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: moore; roymoore; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Maybe someone can pull up the actual complaint filed by Moore.

Not looking forward to the Moore is a sore loser posts. The math has shown over and over again that the democrats are cheating somehow. Only a fool does not do everything possible to find out why the math does not agree.

1 posted on 12/27/2017 11:58:19 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Revel

I would love to see the fraud but it must be presented.

No proof, no nothing.


2 posted on 12/28/2017 12:00:59 AM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Well said. We have to put an end to the cheating now.
So thankful he is doing this.


3 posted on 12/28/2017 12:02:38 AM PST by trustandobey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

And when it’s the dems crying for investigation into election fraud, they are champions of the Constitution and democracy.

All depends on who’s doing the charging.

I hope he can prove something.

I’m sick of spineless Republicans who just roll over for the dems on every election that is stolen from them.


4 posted on 12/28/2017 12:05:52 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Why didn’t he take a polygraph and ask his accusers to take one BEFORE the election? It could have been done publicly with an independent polygrapher. It could have cleared him.


5 posted on 12/28/2017 12:06:26 AM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

"...The math has shown over and over again the Democrats are cheating somehow..."


If he can present clear and credible evidence, people will listen.
What we don’t need is yet another flawed candidate who never goes away.


6 posted on 12/28/2017 12:08:00 AM PST by Blue Jays ( Rock hard ~ Ride free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

The Fraud came from his Accusers, not the Voters.

They just stayed home because the number of Women accusing Moore of “something” made then uneasy in Voting for him.

The Media and the Rats pulled this off without much Election Fraud needed.

(I have no that some may have occurred, but not enough to swing the Election if the Republicans had come out to Vote for Moore)


7 posted on 12/28/2017 12:08:50 AM PST by Kickass Conservative ( Tweet softly, but carry a big stick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

The only way it can be found out is if someone goes over every single aspect of the election with a fine tooth comb. And I have yet to see anyone do that. Just like with all those districts around Philly that come back with over 100% of eligible voters voting. For one- Someone has to check on every single voter in certain areas to find out if they are all legit.

And why do the democrats get so upset as soon as anyone tries to verify?


8 posted on 12/28/2017 12:10:09 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revel

If Moore had just 10% of the a$$ women have accused him of from 40 years ago, he would be shaped like a toilet seat!

We need him in the Senate!


9 posted on 12/28/2017 12:12:38 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama Fascism) http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Using any maneuver to keep Jones out of the Senate is paramount.


10 posted on 12/28/2017 12:12:48 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

I’ll let you in on a little secret. polygraph’s have no better than a 50% accuracy rate. Flipping a coin gives you the same odds. They are really nothing more than an interrogation tool used by law enforcement. If you watch shows like forensic files that will become obvious.

There was a case I saw somewhere where two teachers were suspects in a crime. They both took a polygraph. One passed and one failed. Later the evidence proved that the polygraph was wrong on both counts. It can’t get any worse than that.


11 posted on 12/28/2017 12:16:55 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
If he can present clear and credible evidence, people will listen.

If he has such evidence, all Hell will break loose in Alabama and in the Senate. Jones supporters will scream that he won and should be sworn in, which Senate Democrats will demand on a daily basis. Meanwhile, Moore supporters will demand that he be sworn in. Until the dispute would be resolved, Luther Strange would remain a Senator.

12 posted on 12/28/2017 12:30:01 AM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Three national Election Integrity experts reached the same independent conclusion: “with a reasonable degree of statistical and mathematical certainty…election fraud occurred.”


13 posted on 12/28/2017 12:31:31 AM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Richard Charnin, who holds three degrees in applied mathematics, and who has written four books on election fraud,

calculates the probability of the election results in these precincts happening naturally is “less than one in 15 billion.”


14 posted on 12/28/2017 12:33:18 AM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
Three national Election Integrity experts reached the same independent conclusion: “with a reasonable degree of statistical and mathematical certainty…election fraud occurred.”

That does not mean anything by itself. The question is whether the fraud committed in favor of Jones minus the fraud committed in favor of Moore is greater than the 21,000 vote difference. It will take a lot of evidence to prove fraud on that scale. Then you'll have the Democrats with their mathematicians and their evidence of pro-Moore fraud.

15 posted on 12/28/2017 12:45:34 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Revel; TigerClaws; trustandobey

This is how they do it:

Experts Find Evidence of Electronic “Vote-Flipping” in Tim Canova Loss to Wasserman-Schultz
Hubpages ^
Posted on October 26, 2016 2:30:44 PM EDT by TigerClaws

Weeks after Bernie Sanders protégé Tim Canova went down in defeat in a strong primary challenge to US Representative Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz, professional statisticians say they have uncovered the same kind of statistically unlikely voting pattern which was found in the 2016 Democratic primary between Hilary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. They are calling for a visual inspection of some or all of the actual ballots in order to rule out the presence of electronic “vote-flipping.”

Because the two counties involved both use vote-scanning machines which create digital images of the ballots, visual inspection of the ballots could consist of obtaining the digital images held by the counties, and counting the votes using the images rather than the paper ballots.

In her website Holler Back, election integrity activist and Edward R. Murrow award-winning journalist Lulu Fries’dat published the commentaries of Professors Fritz Scheuren and Elizabeth Clarkson. Scheuren is the 100th president of the American Statistical Association and teaches at George Washington University. Clarkson teaches at Wichita State University in Kansas. Dr. Scheuren said:

“We have to find a way to find out if they were manipulated, and that requires a recount, of at least a sample of locations.”

The vote pattern identified in the analysis of the Canova - Wasserman-Schultz primary, a closely watched race, is uncovered by what election experts call “cumulative vote tally” analysis. This analysis arranges precincts by size - numbers of registered voters - and studies candidate performance along these lines. As with many counties, cities,and towns in the Democratic primaries, the experts found a tendency for the “establishment” candidate to do much better as precinct size increased.

The pattern is suggestive of the electronic version of “ballot stuffing” in larger precincts. The relationship was uncanny, according to the election experts and mathematicians, with no good explanation when controlled for race, income, or any other demographic factor.


16 posted on 12/28/2017 1:09:36 AM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

In this case, you can expect the GOPe to have sanctioned any cheating.

Moore seems like a bit of an idiot to me, but I expect there was cheating that shouldn’t be allowed to stand.


17 posted on 12/28/2017 1:10:20 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

From the voter fraud analysts:

.........”No matter what percentages of the actual votes we distributed to the candidates, we were unable to replicate the reported results. If the division of the votes is close to what we started with in Figure 7 and then a manufactured 3.5% increase in Wasserman Schultz’ results, and a manufactured 3.5% decrease in Canova’s results are input into the graph, then the reported totals can be replicated almost exactly (Figure 9).”

This would seem to imply some kind of manipulation was necessary to obtain these results. It is possible that the reported results are based on demographic trends, but that those trends are being exaggerated in some way.
http://www.hollerbackfilm.com/blog/wass-can


18 posted on 12/28/2017 1:26:08 AM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Of course they cheat. It’s what they’ve become. Liars, cheaters and frauds. Their corrupt swamp is too valuable to them to lose.

IT’S WHY THEY MUST BE DEFEATED!

Go Trump! Go MAGA!


19 posted on 12/28/2017 1:31:47 AM PST by Bullish (Whatever it takes to MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Nearly half a million Trump voters stayed home. I knew those allegations would be tough to overcome (even if he is innocent) because people can’t prove it. Plus, he ran a terrible campaign. If he took a polygraph right away and was out there every day campaigning and defending himself as opposed to hiding, the results might have been different. If these experts are credible, they should look into it to ensure there is no fraud, but people shouldn’t get their hopes up.


20 posted on 12/28/2017 1:34:17 AM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson