Skip to comments.Feminist Eve Ensler urges women to vote against Sarah Palin
Posted on 09/25/2008 12:30:13 PM PDT by pissant
Feminist-activist Eve Ensler wants women across the country to vote against a woman. A woman named Sarah Palin, who's running for vice president on John McCain's Republican ticket. Men can join in too. On the Huffington Post, the acclaimed author of "The Vagina Monologues" blogs:
I write because I believe we hold this election in our hands. This vote is a vote that will determine the future not just of the U.S., but of the planet. It will determine whether we create policies to save the earth or make it forever uninhabitable for humans.
It will determine whether we move towards dialogue and diplomacy in the world or whether we escalate violence through invasion, undermining and attack.
It will determine whether we go for oil, strip mining, coal burning or invest our money in alternatives that will free us from dependency and destruction.
It will determine if money gets spent on education and healthcare or whether we build more and more methods of killing.
It will determine whether America is a free open tolerant society or a closed place of fear, fundamentalism and aggression."
And shes a bit frightened of what will happen if John McCain and Sarah Palin are elected. And not just in this country.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...
Who? And why should normal women care what this ditz says?
I’ve actually never even heard Ensler’s name. And, good Lord, what a drama queen!
“This vote is a vote that will determine the future not just of the U.S., but of the planet. It will determine whether we create policies to save the earth or make it forever uninhabitable for humans.”
She is not all that and a bag of potato chips.
The hypocrisy is amazing. Many of these feminists have been screaming out “girl power” for the last 40 years. and now a woman has a legit shot at being Vice President of the United States, and they are sounding like the sexist pigs they rebelled against in the 50s and 60s.
Pseudofeminists unable to support real women.
Perhaps someone could send this video to her! :)
Does brooke Shields ever take a bad picture? I think not.
She was supporting Hillary- i wonder if she became a PUMA.
Isn't that a bit melodramatic and self-centered? I doubt that future historians will notice this as more than a bump (or dip) in the road.
Reminds me of Scary Movie:
This way to complete safety.
That way to CERTAIN DEATH!
Democrats just aren’t ready for a female president. First they ditch “She Who Should Not Be Named”, now they want to ditch Gov. Palin. Democrats are quite sexist. And we also know they are racists, which is yet another reason why BO won’t win.
tolerance = anything goes, no boundaries, no behavioral restrictions, all consequences transferred to those who make responsible decisions. fundamentalism = any reference to objective moral standards
tolerance = anything goes, no boundaries, no behavioral restrictions, all consequences transferred to those who make responsible decisions.
fundamentalism = any reference to objective moral standards
I would like Ms. Ensler to tell me HOW her insipid play about a woman’s private parts makes women better people.
How on earth do people this of dross like this?
this s/b think
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.