Skip to comments.Questions raised over Afghan raid to free journalist (reporter warned...rescuer/others dead)
Posted on 09/09/2009 11:54:10 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet
The press questioned Thursday whether military force should have been used to rescue a journalist held hostage in Afghanistan, after his assistant, two civilians and a British soldier were killed.
And the death of a soldier in the raid sparked anger in the army here, the Daily Telegraph said, after claims Farrell brushed aside security advice by venturing into a Taliban stronghold.
"When you look at the number of warnings this person had it makes you really wonder whether he was worth rescuing, whether it was worth the cost of a soldier's life," a senior army source told the Telegraph.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I’ll only add that there is more to this than is being released. Some from previous posts, granted unsupported, but also due to ‘some’ reporters who did provide insight into Taliban/Al Q.
Regardless, I mourn the losses.
In the spirit of “original” investigative reporting (non political), I hope that the reporter’s rescue is worthy of his rescuers loss.
It isn't. Farrell wanted to do a hit piece about how evil NATO forces intentionally killed innocent civilians. He was warned not to go into the Taliban controlled area but did so anyway. Should have let the Taliban keep him.
Thanks. I even saw this covered on PBS with the same questioning (reporter oblivious to danger/armed forces used to rescue same)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.