Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walgreens will now let customers use bathrooms based on gender identity
NY Post ^ | 2/6/18 | C Perez

Posted on 02/07/2018 1:51:10 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

Walgreens has decided to change its bathroom policies following an incident at one of their Los Angeles locations — in which a woman was denied access to the ladies room because she “looked like a man.”

The drugstore chain will now allow customers to “use restroom facilities that correspond to the individual’s gender identity, regardless of the individual’s sex assigned at birth,” according to officials.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boycott; homosexualagenda; mental; perversion; pharmacy; target; unisex; walgreens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Losing business from me must not be a problem for Walgreens.

Target lost it, so now Walgreens loses it.

1 posted on 02/07/2018 1:51:10 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Goodbye Wahlgreens!! And ALL because one SICKO complained!


2 posted on 02/07/2018 1:52:16 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

But..what if I sexually identify as a main battle tank and have had armor plates surgically grafted onto my body?
Will they allow me, treads, cannon and all to use their restroom?


3 posted on 02/07/2018 1:52:53 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I didn’t even know Walgreens had restrooms. I usually save my dumps for Kroger, and I’ve used the women’s restroom there more than once, because the men’s stall was occupied. If you gotta go...


4 posted on 02/07/2018 1:58:01 AM PST by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
regardless of the individual’s sex assigned at birth

I refuse to believe a normal person said this. What ACLU or Walgreen's lawyer decided to pull out these laughable SJW terms?

5 posted on 02/07/2018 2:03:15 AM PST by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

My SWAG here is that most public concerns were already raising no fuss about restroom visitors whose garb correlated to the room designation.

But our dear trans-genderists couldn’t leave it there. They had to be visible to get in the public eye.


6 posted on 02/07/2018 2:09:28 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

"...I identify as Doppler radar"

7 posted on 02/07/2018 2:12:34 AM PST by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand....never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

>> “the individual’s sex assigned at birth”

Idiot.


8 posted on 02/07/2018 2:13:22 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Lol. Like each baby born is rolled down an assembly belt on the way to the nursery and gets a pink or blue tag based on the descretion/quick decision of a government-paid factory worker.


9 posted on 02/07/2018 2:21:42 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“...regardless of the individual’s sex assigned at birth,”

Actually, sex is assigned at conception. Formerly, it was acknowledged at birth. Now we have technology so we don’t have to wait. Or now we wait to see, supposedly, if the individual agrees with what is between his/her legs.

When you can get a culture to actually question their sex on a large scale, then it is all over for that culture. I don’t know if even God can intervene.


10 posted on 02/07/2018 2:26:04 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

From the article:

“...the individual’s sex assigned at birth”

Uh, NO, it is assigned at CONCEPTION by the CHROMOSOMES.

THAT’S SCIENCE!


11 posted on 02/07/2018 2:26:05 AM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

If I have to go to the bathroom in a Walgreens, I am pretty sure I am going to grab the first empty seat. And no one will want to venture into there for a few hours.


12 posted on 02/07/2018 2:35:49 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Burn. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

The concept would shortly become meaningless.

Sex egalitarianism has been tried before and failed. The movement now may be getting more fuel from even negative publicity than if it were ignored.


13 posted on 02/07/2018 2:47:02 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I don't shop at Walgreens, CVS, Rite-Aid, etc. For anything. Ever.

If my wife needs a prescription, I go to a locally-owned pharmacy. (I personally don't do pharma, so I don't use their services anyway).

Nothing to do with a bathroom policy or anything else. But because these monster chain pharmacies were pushing Obamacare as a matter of corporate policy.

So this change doesn't personally affect me. I haven't stepped foot in a chain pharmacy in years and thus cannot boycott them because of this.

14 posted on 02/07/2018 2:50:43 AM PST by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

As if back room pharmacy restrooms were not creepy enough


15 posted on 02/07/2018 2:54:40 AM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Did I miss something? Unless I overlooked it, neither the linked story nor the linked ACLU release clarifies whether the person in question was really a woman, a trans woman, a cross dresser, or whatever. The stories simply say a “woman” was denied access to the women’s room because “she” looked like a man. If she was a real woman, dressed as a woman, who has a somewhat masculine appearance, she would have a complaint. But somehow I doubt that’s what was going on.


16 posted on 02/07/2018 3:03:02 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’m a man so I may as well pee on the side of Walgreen’s buildings since there are no choices of “men only” on the inside. What would be the point of going inside?

This whole thing is the result of a trend of rebellion against our Maker, who receives contempt from His ungrateful arrogant creatures when they deny the faculties that He assigned them.

Satan has led us into this. He is the chief factor here. WOE to those who have partnership with him.


17 posted on 02/07/2018 3:09:18 AM PST by Repent and Believe (The Son of Man, when He cometh, shall He find, think you, faith on earth? Jesus Christ (Luke 18:8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

They were the best kept secret in public restrooms and Pat from SNL just ruined it.


18 posted on 02/07/2018 3:29:24 AM PST by CommieCutter ("Trump is god emperor and he will win." -- some hacker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

No more going to Walgreens. They just lost the business I used to give them.


19 posted on 02/07/2018 3:29:26 AM PST by ducttape45 ("Righteousness exalteth a nation; but sin is a reproach to any people." Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

CVS it is.


20 posted on 02/07/2018 3:46:09 AM PST by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson